HomeFeaturesDailyBriefingsRapidReconSpecial ReportsAbout Us

A ThreatsWatch Update

There are obviously many events occuring at this time that warrant our coverage. For the last week, we've been working to complete a review of the potential strategic directions the United States may take with regard to Iraq. This, along with the typical challenge of keeping up with events throughout the world, has left ThreatsWatch without significant updates. Our apologies and regrets for that.

We believe that when completed and published, you will find our efforts to have been worth the lack of updates at ThreatsWatch. Thanks for standing by.

2 Comments

Steve,
Desert Rat linked Robert Haddick's article at TCS, which I think you will find of interest.
The disconnect between our goals and the means to attain them has made success illusive.
Robert reigns in those goals somewhat. I would be interested in your reaction.

http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=121806A

Robert's blog is Westhawk
http://www.westhawk.blogspot.com/

To effectively conduct a war in a two-party representative democracy like the USA, at least 60 to 70% of the nation must support the effort. Anything less and the party that is out of power will oppose the war and likely claim the next election. I hate to keep harping on the Vietnam War, but it is such a good example of how a war is lost through politics and not on the battlefield.

President Bush has a little less than two years to show a demonstrable improvement in the effort and outcome of the Iraq War otherwise the Democrats will surely win the presidency, probably a lot more, and begin the reployment of troops.

And Bush’s endeavor will be made even more difficult because any coordinated opposition to a war effort assuredly encourages the enemy----I hate to say it, but just ask General Giap (figuratively speaking).