HomeFeaturesDailyBriefingsRapidReconSpecial ReportsAbout Us

Loose Lips Sink Spies - Porter Goss

The New York Times has published an OpEd by the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency concerning leaks of classified information, which is in no small measure ironic. From Porter Goss' Loose Lips Sink Spies:

At the Central Intelligence Agency, we are more than holding our own in the global war on terrorism, but we are at risk of losing a key battle: the battle to protect our classified information.

Judge Laurence Silberman, a chairman of President Bush's commission on weapons of mass destruction, said he was "stunned" by the damage done to our critical intelligence assets by leaked information. The commission reported last March that in monetary terms, unauthorized disclosures have cost America hundreds of millions of dollars; in security terms, of course, the cost has been much higher. Part of the problem is that the term "whistleblower" has been misappropriated. The sharp distinction between a whistleblower and someone who breaks the law by willfully compromising classified information has been muddied.

Many will remember when the New York Times exposed secret CIA air operations in May 2005, with a little help from a friend...a CIA pilot who leaked it to them.

Loose lips sink ships, spies and entire counter-terrorism operations. That there is American opposition to nearly every American effort in the War on Terror remains dumbfounding.

Again, from Director Goss:

Last month, a news article in this newspaper described a "secret meeting" to discuss "highly classified" techniques to detect efforts by other countries to build nuclear weapons. This information was attributed to unnamed intelligence officials who "spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the effort's secrecy." Whether accurate or not, this is a direct acknowledgment that these unnamed officials apparently know the importance of secrecy.

Recently, I noticed renewed debate in the news media over press reports in 1998 that Osama bin Laden's satellite phone was being tracked by United States intelligence officials. In the recent debate, it was taken for granted that the original reports did not hurt our national security efforts, and any suggestions that they did cause damage were dismissed as urban myth. But the reality is that the revelation of the phone tracking was, without question, one of the most egregious examples of an unauthorized criminal disclosure of classified national defense information in recent years. It served no public interest. Ultimately, the bin Laden phone went silent.

1 Comment

This problem will continue to grow until we get some LEADERSHIP from the top that will demand PROSECUTION and then MAXIMUM sentence for these leakers its high Treason.

The list of treasonous criminals is long from Gov insiders to Senators to Staff. Their was a time in this nation when government officials especially in a time of war saw it more important to protect a war effort than their partisan political views.

By the way the NYT’s reporters are still today writing stories. Their reporters should be in prison the newspaper for not honoring a government request to hold info should be sanctioned and their license revoked.